I had dinner tonight with Barak, Michiel (who started today as an intern from Hitotsubashi Biz School) and 4 students from Stanford's ATI program. Michiel said that he thought that I was unfocused. (I've been called this before. Jun called me "scatterbrained" when asked about me after he first met me.) Michiel said he felt my blog was too unfocused. I guess that's true, but I thought it was a feature, not a problem. Michiel admitted that he was often negative. (Jun said the other day that he thought people sounded 30% smarter when they were negative.) Anyway, I had been actually been worried about this in my blog, but I didn't admit it to Michiel. So, I wonder. Do people care what I care about or is focus and order more important than my random thoughts. I guess it depends. (Doesn't everything.) At the Fortune brainstorm meeting former congressman Jack Kemp said, "People don't care how much you know until they know that you care." So I guess I wonder whether people are reading primarily for 1) entertainment, 2) because they care about what I think, 3) they are looking for information... Again, I'm sure it's a combination. Maybe I should do a cluster analysis on my readers. Maybe I shouldn't care. As 10 Tips on Writing the Living Web says, (I found this site on Blogdex.) "write for yourself; you are, in the end, your most important reader." So there you go. I'm justified.
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Joi published on February 6, 2005 4:36 AM.
GB of Howard was the previous entry in this blog.
Wikinews meets the bloggers is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index.
Tag Cloud
Categories
- Activism (77)
- Advanced Science (9)
- Art (53)
- BitTorrent (1)
- Blogging about Blogging (501)
- Books (64)
- Business and the Economy (19)
- CPSR (4)
- Computer and Network Risks (26)
- Consumer Electronics (22)
- Cool Web Sites (81)
- Creative Commons (151)
- Dashboard (1)
- Eating and Cooking (40)
- Ecology (12)
- Economics (39)
- Email (18)
- Emergent Democracy (111)
- Energy (13)
- Flash (5)
- Gadgets (88)
- Games (35)
- Gender (10)
- Global Politics (113)
- Global Voices (39)
- Hardware (13)
- Health and Medicine (95)
- Heckling (46)
- Human Rights (19)
- Humor (164)
- ICANN (50)
- IM (2)
- IRC (47)
- Identity (15)
- Information and Media (60)
- Intellectual Property (124)
- Internet Policy (13)
- Introspective (79)
- Japanese Culture (123)
- Japanese National ID (29)
- Japanese Policy (97)
- Japanese Politics (50)
- Joi's Diary (656)
- Joicards (4)
- LOAF (15)
- Leadership and Entrepreneurship (21)
- Marketing (36)
- Media and Journalism (165)
- Moblogging (47)
- Movies (45)
- Mozilla (13)
- Music (103)
- Neoteny (20)
- Network Technology (51)
- Open Source Software (13)
- People (21)
- Photo (155)
- Podcasts (17)
- Privacy (104)
- Python Fun (18)
- Reforming Japanese Democracy (28)
- Religion (29)
- SARS (12)
- Salon (1)
- Search (51)
- Second Life (6)
- Sharing Economy (23)
- Six Apart (11)
- Social Software (116)
- Socialtext (5)
- Software (81)
- Technology Controversy (68)
- Technorati (26)
- US Policy and Politics (204)
- Venture Capital (17)
- Video (33)
- VoIP (12)
- Warblogging (101)
- Wiki (64)
- Wireless and Mobile (112)
- World of Warcraft (19)
Monthly Archives
- January 2009 (2)
- December 2008 (23)
- November 2008 (14)
- October 2008 (10)
- September 2008 (11)
- August 2008 (13)
- July 2008 (18)
- June 2008 (16)
- May 2008 (6)
- April 2008 (5)
- March 2008 (4)
- February 2008 (10)
- January 2008 (10)
- December 2007 (13)
- November 2007 (8)
- October 2007 (11)
- September 2007 (14)
- August 2007 (9)
- July 2007 (14)
- June 2007 (14)
- May 2007 (13)
- April 2007 (23)
- March 2007 (19)
- February 2007 (14)
- January 2007 (13)
- December 2006 (20)
- November 2006 (12)
- October 2006 (5)
- September 2006 (10)
- August 2006 (7)
- July 2006 (8)
- June 2006 (20)
- May 2006 (14)
- April 2006 (10)
- March 2006 (17)
- February 2006 (17)
- January 2006 (20)
- December 2005 (23)
- November 2005 (45)
- October 2005 (37)
- September 2005 (28)
- August 2005 (37)
- July 2005 (37)
- June 2005 (29)
- May 2005 (48)
- April 2005 (55)
- March 2005 (44)
- February 2005 (37)
- January 2005 (43)
- December 2004 (57)
- November 2004 (79)
- October 2004 (85)
- September 2004 (62)
- August 2004 (78)
- July 2004 (77)
- June 2004 (61)
- May 2004 (72)
- April 2004 (56)
- March 2004 (76)
- February 2004 (74)
- January 2004 (94)
- December 2003 (71)
- November 2003 (69)
- October 2003 (72)
- September 2003 (71)
- August 2003 (59)
- July 2003 (65)
- June 2003 (60)
- May 2003 (53)
- April 2003 (79)
- March 2003 (106)
- February 2003 (71)
- January 2003 (68)
- December 2002 (56)
- November 2002 (54)
- October 2002 (73)
- September 2002 (50)
- August 2002 (61)
- July 2002 (32)
- June 2002 (12)
- May 2002 (1)
- April 2002 (2)
- December 2001 (1)
- October 2001 (1)
- July 2001 (1)
- February 2001 (1)
- January 2001 (1)
- December 2000 (1)
- November 2000 (1)
- October 2000 (1)
- September 2000 (1)
- August 2000 (1)
- July 2000 (1)
- June 2000 (1)
- May 2000 (1)
- April 2000 (2)
- March 2000 (1)
- February 2000 (1)
- January 2000 (1)
- December 1999 (1)
- November 1999 (1)
- October 1999 (1)
- September 1999 (3)
- April 1999 (1)
- February 1999 (5)
- January 1999 (2)
- December 1998 (2)
- October 1998 (1)
- August 1998 (7)
- November 1997 (1)
- October 1997 (1)
- June 1997 (1)
- April 1997 (1)
- October 1996 (1)
- October 1995 (1)
- June 1995 (1)
- May 1995 (1)
- March 1995 (2)
- November 1994 (1)
- July 1993 (2)
![Joi Ito [logo]](/_site/img/joi-ito-logo-92x.png)



Loose organization seems to me to be one of the main attractions to blogs. If you spend more of your time organizing the content around certain issues, you get something that's aimed at certain issues, not something which is centered around you and what you were thinking (or happened to notice) that certain day. So, unless you find yourself not meeting some goal or other about the page being more thorough in certain areas, it would be a shame to have you curtail the range of things you put on here.
I'm interested in what you have to say for a couple reasons. Maybe this will help.
First, in my experience, you pick up on important technocultural trends early -- you were the first person to show me a personal webzine (Dale Dougherty had shown me the web a few weeks earlier).
Second, you have an unusual social network -- from Otaku to World Economic Forum.
Third, you are very smart.
I'm not in the business of telling people to change who they are. However, I do think it's a good exercise for you and for your readers for you to think about ways to sharpen your focus. I think it's perfectly reasonable to be very broad and scattered -- maybe we share that propensity. But you do have some unique perspectives, opportunities, and insights. Those are the factors I look for here. I can get the other news elsewhere.
Thanks Howard. Good comments. Interesting how, when wrapped in praise, criticism is a lot easier to take. ;-) I will try to focus more on insights and less on news and see if this helps to focus of this blog... It's just that the news is just SO interesting these days. Maybe I can take my urge to share news over to opencola and see how that works.
By the way, I think some people thing blogging about blogs is circular and silly. To hell with them. Blogging about blogs is fun and significant. The more I do it, the more interesting it gets. Definitely much deeper than it first appears.
JOI, really I feel this way, there are no rights or wrongs in life, only learning experiences. This year you may blog one way, next year it could be another way. Point is there are no rules. I come here to learn and be entertained. I cant wait to keep up Howard's new book. I'm fascinated with this new society, and you are the people who put a name to it. I say, be yourself, scattered or whatever. I find it perfectly charming.
:-)
Joi, I have just spent half an hour reading your blogs and i hope you don't change a thing! I like the fact you are Japanese, and I enjoy reading your perspective. Blogs don't have to focussed, they should be informative and/or entertainig. Yours is both.