A very important message from Cory Doctorow about the broken process at the IEEE on electronic voting machine standardization. If you are an IEEE member or have influence at the IEEE you should read this.

The IEEE, normally the sobersided epitome of integrity and accountability, has had one of its standards-committees jump the tracks. The people who are writing the IEEE standard for voting machines have been doing their best to rig their deliberative process ot exclude input from non-vendors who want the standard to include performance metrics that will guard against electoral malfeasance. This is heavy stuff: the standard this committee produces will likely form the basis of the US goverment's voting-machine purchases (as well as those of governments abroad), and if there are holes in the standard today, they will be biting our democracies on the ass for decades. There's never been a clearer demonstration that "architecture is politics."

IEEE is better than this. If you're a member of the organization, please take a moment to read up on this disaster-in-the-making and then use the form at the EFF's action-center to write to the IEEE and ask them to investigate this -- before it's too late.

..instead of using this opportunity to create a performance standard, setting benchmarks for e-voting machines to meet with regards to testing the security, reliability, accessibility and accuracy of these machines, P1583 created a design standard, describing how electronic voting machines should be configured (and following the basic plans of most current electronic voting machines). Even more problematic, the standard fails to require or even recommend that voting machines be truly voter verified or verifiable, a security measure that has broad support within the computer security community.

To make matters worse, EFF has received reports of serious procedural problems with the P1538 and SCC 38 Committee processes, including shifting roadblocks placed in front of those who wish to participate and vote, and failure to follow basic procedural requirements.We've heard claims that the working group and committee leadership is largely controlled by representatives of the electronic voting machine vendor companies and others with vested interests.

Link

1 Comment

anyone know where there headquarters are?

I'd bet an organization so used to operating out of public eye would be really easy to influence with even a small street level protest. Classic ACT UP! tactic.

Leave a comment

2 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: IEEE members: save democracy from a broken standards-committee!.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://joi.ito.com/MT-4.35-en/mt-tb.cgi/1010

The EFF is urging IEEE members to express concern over the draft electronic voting standards. Cory blogs about the situation as does Joi. During my internship I tried to convince Lt. Governor Bustamante's policy department to request that the Secretary... Read More

Very smart computer person Joi Ito doesn't like the black-box risks of e-voting either, and reports; In news at once frightening and reassuring, a Sequoia electronic voting machine suffered a very public failure last week during a live demo. The... Read More

About this Archive

This page is an archive of recent entries in the Business and the Economy category.

Books is the previous category.

Computer and Network Risks is the next category.

Find recent content on the main index.

Monthly Archives