Bjorn Lomborg

What if hospitals only dealt with patients who made the most fuss. That's what it seems like we do with global resource allocation for global problems. Why don't we prioritize? What if we had an extra$ 50Bn to allocate. What would you spend it on?

HIV aids?
Schools?
Climate age?
Malnutrition?

We need rational basis on our spending.

The Copenhagen Consensus was a group of leading economists who got together to try to prioritize based on best information available.

What we would do:

1- Prevent HIV - $27Bn will save 29M lives
2- Micronutrients - $13Bn will help more than 1/2 the world
3- Free Trade - would create more than $2000Bn / yr
4- Treat Malaria - $12Bn could come back 10X or more

What we wouldn't do?

Kyoto (global warming) is not a good use of money

Focus on high benefit projects.

We now have the list. We have to get the rest of the world on board.

3 Comments

I would recommend you guys read first chapter (written by Lomborg) of You Have to Admit It's Getting Better: From Economic Prosperity to Environmental Quality, published by Hoover Institution (available for free on pdf).

Wow, the Copenhagen Consensus web site is super lame. The whole thing is just a bunch of PDFs to download.

Leave a comment

1 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Brainstorm 2004 notes - Bjorn Lomborg.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://joi.ito.com/MT-4.35-en/mt-tb.cgi/2582

back in june i picked up a list of challenges and dropped it in here, but this is a dark, cold corner of the internet. today, joi ran into that adventure at brainstorm. behold, the power of light. the copenhagen... Read More

About this Archive

This page is an archive of recent entries in the Business and the Economy category.

Books is the previous category.

Computer and Network Risks is the next category.

Find recent content on the main index.

Monthly Archives