They're all Creative Commons Attribution licensed so free to use with attribution. If they're pictures of yourself, go ahead and use them without attribution if you have to.
June 2007 Archives
Ars Electronica transcribed my World of Warcraft talk from 23C3 last year for publication of the article in the Ars Electronica Catalog 07, Goodbye Privacy (Schöpf, Christine / Stocker, Gerfied (Eds.): Ars Electronica 2007: Goodbye Privacy. Ostfildern, Hatje Cantz 2004). I fixed up the transcription with minor edits. I thought I'd share it although it is a bit old.
Joi Ito presentation at 23C3, Dec 30, 2006
Back in the early days of MMORPGs, you met people online who you would play with and they were your friends, but it was cyberspace and real life. Sometimes you had crossovers, but generally you didn’t run into people walking down the street who also played. The difference is with almost 9 million players (although 6 million are in China) you can now go to a dinner in Silicon Valley or in Berlin and you’ll often find somebody else who plays World of Warcraft. Families play. If you look at the statistics, a huge number of people play who are real-life friends, which is a different than it used to be. So I think that World of Warcraft is similar to what we’ve have been working on for a long time, but it’s a big jump and it’s growing very, very fast. And I think it’s going to grow faster.
First of all one of the things that people often ask is whether World of Warcraft is so much better than Second Life. You shouldn’t compare them. It’s like apples and oranges. People who are my age may remember MUDs (Multi-User Dungeons). They spun off MOOs (MUD object oriented) and MUSHes (Multi-User Shared Hack) where it was more about creating things and creating objects. The kinds of people who participated in MOOs and MUSHes were very different from the kinds of people who participated in MUDs. MUDs were more about constraints and limitations and game-play. You could die in MUDs. When I played the original MUD at Essex University, I was one level from becoming immortal and then I was killed. And in the original MUD, when you were dead, you were dead. There’s was cemetery where you could just walk back to your corpse. You were dead and had to start over again.
If you compare Second Life and MMORPGs, it is a completely different thing. It is like the difference between being a racing-car driver and being in some kind of experimental mechanical lab. While they are both virtual worlds and they are both sort of classified in the same genre, I don’t think we should compare them really. I use both of them quite a bit, but differently . In Second Life on my island, we have a very good video screening area. I can screen raid videos. We can sit around and watch them and talk about them on maintenance day when the servers are down. We can sit around and talk about strategy while we watch. I lot of my friends are building an replica of Iron Forge where we can sort of hang around there when the servers are down too.
But to get back to Warcraft... I think this is old news for a lot of people, but Richard Bartle was one of the guys who worked on the first MUD and he had this thing called the Bartle types. He classified people into four basic categories. In Warcraft, one big thing that lead to the success of Warcraft is that they got those four types of game play down very well. The first part is achievement - like game level, game gear, getting better, looking cooler, and a kind of self-achievement growth part of the game. This is your character and it’s all your stats, and they keep getting better. The other important part is exploration. For example the lore. Often it is like talking to the historian and getting into the quest. Some people really get into that and know the whole world of the game. Some people don’t care, but for some people, that’s the main thing. On role-playing servers the lore is very, very important and people are obsessed with that. Another important part is the socialization part. here is the chat window. Some people just sit in Iron Forge, face the wall and just chat all day. Your guild is also your social base. Some people think World of Warcraft is just a fancy IRC (Internet Relay Chat) client. Then there’s the last part, which is the killing. You can sit around and kill other players, you can sit around and kill monsters. You do deal damage, but the main point is competition, struggle, fighting with each other and strategy. It’s a completely different part of the game. If you ask people what their favorite things are and in which order, it defines the way they play the game. If you look at successful guilds, they tend to be focused on a certain balance of these four kinds of game play. Some of them balance all of the parts, and some of them balance some of the parts specifically. This is also an important thing to understand, because when you think about the World of Warcraft you get people who fish all day long. Some of them play in the auction house all day. You can play the game in a completely different and unique way. You can write your add-ons to figure out the economy. All these different game plays are legitimate and interesting but it’s the interaction between these four that actually make it even more interesting. I think Blizzard got a lot of this stuff right.
You start World of Warcraft rather lonely, by yourself. You’ve got this little toolbar. And you’re looking around trying to figure out what to do. You quickly realize, when you’re get a little higher level that you can work together with other people to take down bigger, bad guys. Then, when you get to level 40, you get a mount, so you can ride and move around a lot faster. And this is a very important part of your experience, and then, hey, you’re level 60, hey you’ve won warcraft. [This talk was before the expansion. Now the maximum level is level 70.]
This is a picture of me in August 2005 and this is my gear. And then this is me in January 2006, spiky leathery looking gear. This is me in March 2006 with my Tier 0 set. This is what you get from the little 10-man dungeons. And then when you do the special quests, you get the zero point five set. This set looks slightly better and took another couple of months. And this is the Archanist set that you get from the 40-man dungeon, Molten Core. It requires a lot skill, lots of grinding and lots of work. And this is me today. I’m kind of a mish-mash, of tier two, tier one and other weird things just to trying to do as much damage as I can. But I’m not even half way through my gear yet. And the thing is, I’ve played – this is confidential from the company – but I’ve played a lot. If you look at this calculation, it’s taken me about 30 days of game play to get to level 60. But I’ve been sitting here on level 60 for 72 days and I’m only half way through my gear. You get to level 60 and a new game starts which is more about putting together gear and things like that. People have been stuck there for a long time and its been kind of getting a little bit old. The new content is starting to run out and there’s a limit to how much you can get excited with just gear. We can start leveling again in January when the Burning Crusade comes out. So this is going to be a very big experiment and I think that other games have died when they tried to do this. We’ll see how it’s going to work. You’ve got people who have been stuck level 60 working on their gear for – years and you’ve got people who’ve just arrived at level 60. We will see how the game play is going to work out , and it’s still unclear how successful it will be. [By most measure, the expansion has been a success.]
Since most of you have already played, you’ll know what this is movie is - it is a player versus player environment, Alterac Valley. And this is the alliance versus the horde, the two factions, and I’m sitting here trying to kill the horde to capture this tower.
This is the entrance to Molten Core. And molten core is the first 40-man dungeon that you get to play. You have to be level 60, you have to do some quests to be allowed to get in here. But basically this is, forty people, eight classes, five of each class. You’ve healers that heal, you’ve got tanks that hold these monsters’ attention. The healers heal the tanks, and you’ve got the mages and other classes who do a lot of damage and take bad guys down. Then you’ve got a variety of other classes that do other roles. But the key to this is getting this group together. And also when this group isn’t perfectly balanced, figuring out the right strategy is also a challenge. Imagine trying to organize 40 people every weekend to go to a movie and have eight different roles about what each of those people are going to do. And make them do that over and over again all day for about eight hours. Its is a boring yet difficult task. In order to get that Artemis set that I had, you have to do this every weekend, for about six months.
This is kind of like a ball. First you work to level 60. Grinding by yourself at the beginning, then with five people, then with ten people, and finally you get to go to the ball with 40 people.
When you finally get here and you realize this is the first time you’ve ever seen 40 of your fellow guild mates in one place at one time. And there’s an enormous amount of coordination that’s required. You have raid leaders, you have class leaders – I have about eight different channels going in my chat, with eight different colors for all the different things that I have to coordinate. Some researchers are saying you learn things like project management. This is a great metaphor for some kinds of real-time project management. You get a group together, you learn what each person can do, figure out if there are resources you can put together, and move forward. Clearly are lots of direct and indirect things you can learn from this. You can learn how people work under stress. You can learn how good people are at communicating. My raid leader is a nightshift nurse in Virginia. Our main tank, is a foreman in Australia , one of our rogues is a bartender with ADD. There is an immense amount of diversity in our guild and you can see how their backgrounds help in the game. However, there is a lot of common ground considering the diversity.
One of the things I’ve noticed though. I haven’t found a single MBA so far who is good at leadership in this situation. Most of the people who are good at leading here are people who are good at listening. It’s actually very similar to leadership in open source.. John Seely Brown brings up a very interesting point - that there’s another level of learning that you get. It’s a kind of imagination and emotional thing, and he uses the word “ensemble”. I don’t know what the German word for this, but it’s when you have a band or an orchestra together and suddenly you are in “the zone” and everything just feels right - you’ve just got it just right. When you don’t have it right, a 40-man raid, can disappear in less than ten minutes. Everybody just blows up. When you’re in the zone it just feels right and everything works together.
And it really does feel like some kind of magic when you work and work, and suddenly 40 people are working together in concert. Without having to know the whole of it, they do their part and somehow it works out. I get kids in my guild who are 14 years old. They act like 14-year olds. But when they get into a raid, they realize that if they do something stupid they get kicked out or people get mad at them. If they do something right, suddenly they have 39 adults telling them how great they are. There is a sense of being part of a group and achievement as a group. It is something that you can learn. In my guild, I have priests, soldiers, a policeman, students, businesspeople - I have just about every kind of cross-section of society you can imagine, and it’s actually overwhelmingly working class. If you look at Second Life it’s rather kind of intellectual. [OK, sort of. ;-) ]
For example, the other day, I was chatting with some kid who’s just decided that he’s going to Iraq because it’s better than what he has an option staying home in America because then he can pay for college and come back and become a computer scientist. Sometimes our priest, AKMA, will jump in and clarify theological things for me. The depth and the diversity represented in many of our chats is broader than any other medium I’ve ever participated in.
It’s very different from a chat channel or online form. For instance, our warrior, or “tank” has to have fire-resist gear for Molten Core. It’s really, really hard to get enough fire-resist gear to tank Molten Core. It requires lots of people to help you. Many of the pieces of gear that you need requires hundreds of hours of other people’s time. By the time you get to the point of tanking Molten Core, you have lots of people in the guild who have invested hundreds of hours in your gear. Some of them are 15-year olds, some of them are soldiers, and you owe them and you’ve done things where they owe you.
AKMA, our real life priest and I were talking about the organization the other day. It’s more like a congregation than anything else. You can leave when you want, you don’t pay taxes. You PAY to play the game. You show up because you want to be part of the group. You can leave whenever you want, there’s no one forcing you to do anything, but you have this set of norms, you have a shared activity.
Games are an advanced user interface and have lots of parallels with user interfaces for our operating systems. With 3D worlds I think we’re getting closer and closer to being able to perform every function that you do on your computer. You could actually kind of simulate an computer operating system interface. The interesting thing is that most of us at this meeting stare at computers all day long, but most people in the world don’t. These game interfaces are becoming a de facto interface for a lot of people. They learn how to use it. They learn the metaphors. As a lot of the people who are playing these games get into positions where they are making decisions about UI, I think it’s going to have a huge impact. ONe good thing is that Blizzard used Lua to allow scripting of the UI. You can customize just about everything except for the really critical things. You’re not allowed to communicate real time out of the game. They’re doing a lot of things that prevent you from cheating in the game -which makes sense, Anyway, good thing is that you can do just about anything though. For instance, there is a background option which helps you manage and track auctions and prices on the auction house. Once you’ve added all your add-ins, this is kind of what it looks like. It is like flying with instruments. The 3D behind the interface, it doesn’t really matter, especially as a mage. On the left, you see 40 different players, you can see that some of them are dead. You can see some of them have different levels of different things like mana and health. The middle thing shows some of them are cursed with things that I can remove so I should de-curse them. The little arrow is a hunter’s mark showing what everybody should be attacking. The top right window is my chat with maybe eight different kinds of chat – raid chat, leader chat, class chat, officer chat, guild chat, all that’s going on in there. The other window is system messages like combat messages. I’m tracking all major stats like damage dealt by each person over time or who dealt me the most damage. There are alerts coming from another addon that knows the behavior of the boss. It tells you when certain things are about to happen. These are the stats for the boss, these are the little spells, these are the warriors, because they’re important, to see what they’re pulling.
The threat meter - when monsters are attacking somebody they attack the most threatening person. Warriors have lots of talents to increase their threat even though they’re not doing much damage. Mages have things to decrease their threat even though they’re doing a lot of damage. You have all kinds of tricks. What you do is you watch yourself on the threat meter so that you don’t go over the warrior, otherwise you’re going to be dead. It is very sophisticated. What it does is it takes all these combat messages from the game. It parses them, figures out how much threat each one is generating based on all the different kinds of magic that’s around, discounting and amplifying and all of that. Then it generates the threat for each of its players. Every time they make a patch and change the rules or change the parameters they have to go back and re-do everything. Every time the message that the boss says when he’s casting something changes, they have to change the addon. It’s crazy. They’re parsing text because there’s no API (application program interface) for this. But we have an excellent threat meter that works. There’s a huge add-on community that’s making all this stuff, despite the rather different process. This is fairly sophisticated interface completely customized for myself. I don’t think anyone has the same interface. At this point it’s no longer about 3D.
I’ m going to get back again to Richard Bartle, who’s my hero. But he came from the day when we had cyberspace, and Bartle was talking about cyberspace and the real world. In Japan I don’t think we really believe in cyberspace any more. Cyberspace is part of our real world. And I don’t separate my cyberspace identity nearly as much as I think the old guys do. I mean, I know that we have our online personas and pseudonyms and stuff like that. But one of the things that for Richard Bartle was part of this cyberspace thinking was when you’re in a game you’re in a virtual world, you’re in a fantasy, and you don’t want to shatter that fantasy. You don’t want somebody to take you out of cyberspace when you don’t want to get out of cyberspace. People started talking about whether voice over IP should we be allowed for talking to each other when we’re playing the games - for coordination. He said no. This is back in 2003. He said it would be “an immersion-busting reality-intrusive, anti-role-playing debasement of what virtual worlds are”. And a lot of the game guys were against it. Warcraft doesn’t have it built in, so we use things like TeamSpeak and Ventrilo. They are external applications to do the coordination by voice. But there is no more fantasy. It’s seamless, the real world and the game.
So what’s important to note is that --- you can do this on Skype – you can sit around, connect 10 people together and have it open. But for some reason – and we have tried it as a test – people want to start the conversation and then end it. They’re not used to the idea of always having a voice connection. It’s weird. The thing that you learn on TeamSpeak is firstly that you push to talk. When two people collide there’s a pause. You have a protocol where you both back off. At the beginning it’s sort of clunky, but after a while it sort of works. You just learn how to use this thing so that 40 people can be talking at the same time on the same channel. You have very little problem communicating the essential things, and you learn how to talk in small pieces and get things through. I sometimes sit around all day long - say eight hours with TeamSpeak on. You never sit around in that kind of mode on the telephone. While we have technologies like Skype or voice-over IP that theoretically allow you to do this, because we don’t have the user experience of actually having to use something like that, we haven’t generated that kind of behavior in our workplace. I think one of the interesting things about MMORPGs and voice is that its creating a culture of having Teamspeak on. I have TeamSpeak on my speakers at my house, so even when I’m not in the game I can hear people talking. They can call me and I can go in. It’s this ambient sound so I know how the guild is doing - if somebody’s going crazy or somebody has a problem at home. When one of your guys picked up a girl and her lesbian girlfriend came and beat him up, the first place he goes is to teamspeak to explain it to everyone. It’s a very important kind of water cooler.
Our two guilds together (Horde and Alliance) are about 400 people. About a third of them are horde. And a lot of the time, probably most of the time is spent sitting around inside of our guild and hanging out and socializing. One of our players, Kazpah, Is really into the lore of Warcraft, so every once in a while she has these fireside chats where she sits around and tells these scary stories about the history of World of Warcraft and we have somebody who translates this into horde tongue. These are actually really popular events, and every once in a while somebody starts killing somebody and it degenerates. But generally is it’s a very peaceful and fun thing.
But when you have 400 people together, one of the things that always happens is drama. Everyone who has run organizations knows that running 400 people in an organization is very difficult. And unlike chat, we have loot.
A typical example would be, you’re in some dungeon, and there’s something you really need. And somebody who doesn’t really need it gets it. That becomes a really big point of tension. Drama always exists in parties and also in guilds. For that we have a lot of outside tools. We have forums where a lot of things happen. We have bylaws on a wiki. The bylaws are the rules that we use to govern our guilds - what are you allowed to do, what aren’t you allowed to do, our core values. We share this between horde and alliance. And we are about to organize Bylawcon so we can all get together and revise the bylaws.
There’s an interesting study by sociologists and anthropologists doing a detailed analysis of guilds. Some guilds are very relaxed and they don’t have very many rules. They tend to be less happy than guilds that have fairly strict bylaws and manage things in a very organized way. You would think it’s kind of the opposite, that the relaxed guys would stay relaxed. But it turns out that predicable leadership and rules are very important.
One of the interesting things is that when I set up these bylaws, I looked at a lot of open source projects. I looked at Wikipedia, I looked at Mozilla I looked at some of the others. I’m not an expert in open source, although I play one on TV. I was asking a lot of people about open source and managing open source. I think there’s a lot that you can learn. It’s absolutely not the same. It is very open, in that lots of people can come in, and you’re rewarding mostly by giving people credit. I think there’s a lot we can learn from the management in World of Warcraft. The biggest difference, I think, is that the diversity of the kind of people who participate in World of Warcraft makes it a challenge. For instance, really basic things, like you should respect each other. Some people when they first come are like “WHY? WHY? Why should we respect each other?” And then you sit down and explain why it actually is a good thing. Some people come in who are racist. We’ve had some very racist people in our guild. But if you sit down and explain, “well you know, would you say that, if you knew the other person was that race”, and they said “no”. And then, like, “how do you know in the game that we don’t have you know, Chinese or whatever?” People realize, “Oh he’s a real priest”. They suddenly realize that the diversity in this guild is actually a plus. They suddenly feel the euphoria of being able to talk to a group, and having a reverend sit there and laugh at their jokes, and realize that tolerance in their speech is worth the trade off of being able to communicate with a whole diverse range of people. Embracing diversity is something a lot of kids don’t know anything about, especially in America. And they come to our guild and realize that Chinese kids can be smart too. There’s a fifteen year old kid who apologized for asking me whether I was Japanese. I said don’t worry about it. He said, “will you still be my friend if I ask you if you’re Japanese?” I think, depending on the culture you come from, it’s very different. What is interesting is that as you codify and you write it down, you realize that things that you take for granted aren’t taken for granted by everybody else. But a lot of this is about trust and reputation.
The other interesting outcome is this convergence of machinima. I think most of you probably know what it is, but it’s using game engines and game contents to make video. And as you know, video is huge already. But having video cameras and taking video is also a lot of work and involves a little bit of talent. Building game machinima also involves talent, but at least you can use the game engines to create content. So there’s this huge body of work which is people making video content from World of Warcraft. We have an awesome guild promo video.
So the biggest problem is we don’t have the rights to use most of this stuff. Some of the video is from other guilds. Luckily it wasn’t me who made it and I am only showing this for educational, non-commercial purposes. One of the biggest hurdles right now is that it’s illegal to do most of this some of this stuff. One of the few cases that’s actually pushed machinima past a certain threshold was that MTV saw a video game and some music put together that they loved. They contacted the record label and the video game company, and as you know, if MTV is excited that’s fine. So they broadcast it on MTV and it kind of established machinima as a legitimate form.
Second Life is much better. Second Life allows you to own the content, they encourage Machinima and have video capture built in. Blizzard, they’re friendly, but when I asked them if I could use a screen shot in magazine to talk about how great they are, they said OK, talk to our legal department. And the legal department said, “what kind of magazine is it?” I said it’s owned by a company called Hitachi, and they said, “Is that a corporation? What do they do?” They said, “you have to sign a contract to use this screen shot.” So I didn’t use the screen shot. But they don’t understand – I think they understand the value of fan art, but they don’t understand this notion of sharing and copying yet.
One of the biggest problems that I find with World of Warcraft is they have a sharded system. They have hundreds of servers, and when you start the game and don’t know anybody, you start on some random server. Although they have paid transfers now, basically, even though we both play, there’s probably a one per cent chance that we can actually meet inside the game. So even though people call it the new golf, it’s not. You can talk about what you do, but it’s very difficult to play with your friends. I think that’s a fundamental problem in the design that’s not going to get fixed by just an evolutionary step.
The good thing about Second Life is that they’ve made it so each part is connected, each island, each beach, each Sim is on a separate server. The problem is that each Sim can only support a small number of people, so if you put more people on, the thing crashes. When you walk between Sims you fall in the cracks and things like that. But I think they’re trying I think the idea of making it a single world is going to be an important part of the NEXT game. I think that user-generated content, player generated content – the add-on stuff is important, but if you remember all the way back to when were playing MUDs, one of the best parts of becoming a wizard was that you could create your own dungeons, you could create your own monsters, people could play in your instances. And so while World of Warcraft has done a very good job in creating content, they haven’t allowed players to create their own content. Which I think is where there could be a lot of work done, and I think it’s coming up.
I think there’s a lot of pretty interesting things going on in the guilds, but I would love better guild management tools. For instance, right now, when we’re about to run a raid, what I would love to be able to do is to say, “how many of my priests are available right now, the ones that are available, send them an SMS to see if they’re available, in this order.” And if I’m a priest and I’m sitting around doing my garden and I get an SMS saying we’re about to run Molten Core and were short of priests, I’ll come running. I think that this is an important thing. Second Life has done it pretty well. They’ve got an API and a way to interact with the web and things like that. The problem with Warcraft is that since we don’t have real-time communication, it’s very difficult to build applications that allow guilds to interact with things like that in the game. I don’t see them opening that up in the future. Another big issue around Warcraft is actually that there are theories around gold farmers who basically play the game professionally. They take their items and they sell them and get gold, and then they sell their gold for real money on the Internet. Blizzard says its out of bounds. If you think about the issue of cracking down on this, they say if you are caught buying gold? Well how do you get “caught” buying gold, because you can’t pay in the game. For instance, you buy me dinner and I give you gold. What if I owe you 25 bucks and I give you gold instead, is that buying gold? At what point does it constitute buying gold. If Tim has a character, if I go to a gold farmer and buy gold and have him send gold to Tim, he hasn’t bought gold. There isn’t a way way technically for Blizzard to know if you’ve bought gold really. Some Chinese game companies have actually started doing this item exchange as part of their business model. Second Life has this Linden Dollar exchange. I was talking to one of the Blizzard guys, and one of the reasons they don’t like real-life money linked with gold is that it makes the game less egalitarian, and they want it to be fair. The irony is that some Chinese I talked to about MMORPGs say “Well obviously rich people should have more power in the game” It was kind of ironic to me that it was the Americans that wanted an egalitarian system. Having said that, I don’t see a Warcraft killer on the horizon. I think it’s like a nightclub, so you got to a nightclub, everybody gets excited about it until the next night club opens. I think we’re waiting for the next nightclub. It’s hard to take the risk of opening a new nightclub when you’ve got a big popular one going on and it takes several years to make a game of this size.
Hopefully, some of the open source stuff like Croquet and other things may start developing to the point where they may be some kind of open-source model or something where we can take from learning about World of Warcraft. At the end of the day, I think everything is still heading to more user control, more open source, more open API, more open standards, more open intellectual property. But what this whole thing is is an indication of a behavior change. That’s why it’s important. It’s important that we have millions and millions of people who are learning how to interact this, and can we think up projects that tap that.
Cool things going on on our Sim in Second Life.
blueair.tvBRIAN ENO’S 77 MILLION PAINTINGS TO PREMIERE IN MULTIPLE LOCATIONS ACROSS SECOND LIFE THIS FRIDAY, 8PM PDT, 6/29/07
pdf is here
Click this picture to attend the opening:
We are pleased to announce that this Friday the 29th, at 8 PM PDT (Second Life Time), The Long Now Foundation will begin the Second Life premiere of Brian Eno’s 77 Million Paintings. This will occur alongside its North American premiere in San Francisco, in partnership with blueair.tv. Each installation of 77 Million Paintings will be unique to its location.
The event will open at 8 PM in Second Life on Kula 1 Sim at The Commons amphitheater (intersecting Kula 1 through Kula 4 and by Joi Ito). The opening will include an interview of Second Life artist Angrybeth Shortbread (Annabeth Robinson, creative partner of blueair.tv). Angrybeth developed the 77 Million Paintings remix in Second Life through blueair.tv.
bbc.co.uk/music. For all the details on this announcement, please see our press release.I'm a former board member of and supporter of MusicBrainz/MetaBrainz. It's to CDDB as Firefox is to IE. (Although it does a bunch of other stuff too...) This deal with the BBC is a big win and an important step in becoming ubiquitous in the main stream. Congrats guys!
As I prepared to answer a rather long list of questions for a Macedonian newspaper, I realized that I would be motivated to write more thoroughly and spend more time on the answers if I knew I would be publishing them on my blog. I chatted with the journalist and he agreed. Thanks Vlado.
So here are my answers to some questions about the Internet, CC and Mozilla. Not that new for those of you who know this area, but if you're going to ask me some basic questions, you can start here. ;-)
Maybe I should be plopping this stuff onto a wiki...
Here are the questions:
1. What is Creative Commons license?
From the website: http://creativecommons.org/about/think
How does a Creative Commons license operate?
Creative Commons license are based on copyright. So it applies to all works that are protected by copyright law. The kinds of works that are protected by copyright law are books, websites, blogs, photographs, films, videos, songs and other audio & visual recordings, for example. Software programs are also protected by copyright but, as explained below, we do not recommend that you apply a Creative Commons license to software code or documentation.
Creative Commons licenses give you the ability to dictate how others may exercise your copyright rights—such as the right of others to copy your work, make derivative works or adaptations of your work, to distribute your work and/or make money from your work. They do not give you the ability to restrict anything that is otherwise permitted by exceptions or limitations to copyright—including, importantly, fair use or fair dealing—nor do they give you the ability to control anything that is not protected by copyright law, such as facts and ideas.
Creative Commons licenses attach to the work and authorize everyone who comes in contact with the work to use it consistent with the license. This means that if Bob has a copy of your Creative Commons-licensed work, Bob can give a copy to Carol and Carol will be authorized to use the work consistent with the Creative Commons license. You then have a license agreement separately with both Bob and Carol.
Creative Commons licenses are expressed in three different formats: the Commons Deed (human-readable code), the Legal Code (lawyer-readable code); and the metadata (machine readable code). You don’t need to sign anything to get a Creative Commons license—just select your license at our ‘Publish’ page.
One final thing you should understand about Creative Commons licenses is that they are all non-exclusive. This means that you can permit the general public to use your work under a Creative Commons license and then enter into a separate and different non-exclusive license with someone else, for example, in exchange for money.
2. Can you explain the concept of CC?
From the website:
Creative Commons provides free tools that let authors, scientists, artists, and educators easily mark their creative work with the freedoms they want it to carry. You can use CC to change your copyright terms from "All Rights Reserved" to "Some Rights Reserved."
We're a nonprofit organization. Everything we do — including the software we create — is free.
Creative Commons helps you publish your work online while letting others know exactly what they can and can't do with your work. When you choose a license, we provide you with tools and tutorials that let you add license information to your own site, or to one of several free hosting services that have incorporated Creative Commons.
3. I have a blog. Why should I use CC license?
If you do not use a Creative Commons license, it is not clear to people reading your blog what rights they have to reuse your work. Other than "fair use" or other narrow uses permitted under the laws of various countries, people will have to ask specific permission to reuse photos, text and screenshots of your blog. With a Creative Commons license, people can know if they can use things from your blog without asking permission. The CC license also stipulates that they must give you attribution so that when they use things from your blog, they are required to put your name on it.
For most bloggers who are looking for an audience and to join the conversation, allowing people to use your work and share your knowledge increases the likely hood that you would be quoted on other blogs. If you choose the most liberal license, CC-BY that allows commercial reuse, you are more likely to show up in a newspaper, magazine or TV show. As a blogger, you should weight the "cost" to you of someone using your work in a commercial way, with the attention you would receive by being shown on TV, etc.
Many main stream media publications already quote and use material blogs without permission, but CC allows them (and non-commercial users like bloggers) to know your intent which is important for the ethical and legally conscious sites and shows.
4. You said that now days there is a change of the consumer profile and consumer needs. Can you explain this? (The example of Pepsi and ITunes)
The Internet has enabled a dramatic change in the way we interact with content. We no longer have to be passive consumers, but can be participants in the global dialog of media. The problem is that new technologies and the capability to do things doesn't mean people will. Most new forms of media initially mimicked the old. For instance, photography was for a long time, just like paintings in form. TV shows looked like radio with pictures. Similarly, most people who are in charge of deciding how the Internet is used from a legal or corporate perspective still use the Internet and consume media as if they were in the broadcasting era.
The key to understanding business and the law in the future is to look at the behavior of the young people not as crime, but rather as a new behavior that the world will have to adapt to.
5. Can you explain the concept of Professionals vs Amateurs?
When the cost of the distribution of content was very high, the business of the manufacture and distribution of content was very similar to the industrial manufacturing process. Because of the high cost, most content was created by professionals and the tools for creation and distribution were not available for amateurs. The notion that professionals were high quality and amateur meant low quality sort of made sense in this era.
However, amateurs do things for the love of it. Amateurs do things for no pay not necessarily because they are lower quality. The problem was that in the past, to even make films or TV or music, it was a requirement to be a professional.
Now with low cost creation and distribution technology, the amateur is again part of the creativity world and this notion that professionals are better is less valid. People don't work on Linux because they aren't good enough to work at Microsoft and people don't write blogs just because they aren't good enough to be professional.
What Creative Commons is doing is trying to provide a license and choices for more types of creators than just the industrial professional - for people to whom the sharing is part or all of the reason that they make things. The current application of copyright is skewed mostly for the broadcast manufacture, distribute, consume, model of the world.
6. You said that, now days, more and more people choose happiness over pleasure. How this reflects on Internet?
I think that money can buy pleasure, but money can't necessarily buy happiness. I think that more and more people are choosing to do things in order to become happy instead of doing things just for the money. I'm not sure that there are more people making this choice, but I think that the Internet enables a new kind of sharing and collaboration that allows people who pursue happiness to produce things together. Yochai Benkler would call this Commons Based Peer Production. While I don't think that happiness is the only incentive to collaborate and produce on the Internet, I think that choosing happiness over pleasure / amateur over professional is a core driving element of open source and open content that is becoming exceedingly important on the Internet.
7. Is Internet a initiator of this process?
I'm not sure what this means...
8. How do Hollywood and other major industries accept CC?
There is a mixed response. I think that because the core values of CC involve Free Culture, I think that often this is misinterpreted to mean anti-copyright. In fact CC is not anti-copyright. It is just asking to allow artists to make choices based on what they would like to do.
I think that the enlightened people in the industry know, like and use CC. Some have even begun to understand the commercial benefit of using CC for marketing lesser know artists or for promotion already well know artists. I think that as new business models that involve sharing evolve, people will find that sharing actually makes business sense.
I think that we are struggling to make this case because for most people any change is frightening and disruptive. I am confident, however, that we will wind the hearts and minds of most people in Hollywood.
A good example is the Internet. Initially the Internet (or TCP/IP) was at odds with what most of the worlds companies and standards bodies wanted to do. it was considered rogue and illegal in some countries. Pushing the Internet was a political statement. Now everyone uses it. Some people would like to make it more closed and some of us fight to keep it open, but for the most part, people see its value and realize now that open is better than closed. I think that CC might follow a similar path.
9. What is for you a REMIX, an what an ORIGINAL?
Very little of what is created is truly original. Almost every kind of derivative work involves creativity. I personally believe that culture and ideas and our role is really as participants in a vast evolution of information passing from the past to the future. In that sense, I don't think that it is very wise to differentiate remix and original works too much.
For instance, this article that involves and interview with me... is this original or a remix? What parts of it are original? In fact is it a collaboration between us. I think that you can collaborate in your mind with things you have heard or have inspired you in the past, you can collaborate with books or images that you find, you collaborate with people are you talking to... but in the end, most things we do involve other people and in that sense it is remix.
10. How does technology reflects on low?
Sorry, I'm not sure what this means.
11. What is the concept of Science Commons license?
Science Commons is not a license, it is a new project.
From the website: http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5695
Science Commons works on these problems: inaccessible journal articles, tools locked up behind complex contracts, socially irresponsible patent licensing, and data obscured by technology or end-user licensing agreements. We translate this into projects, with work in three distinctly different project spaces: publishing (covered by copyright), licensing (covered by patent and contract) and data (in the US, covered only by contract). We work on agreements between funders and grant recipients, between universities and researchers and between funders and universities—all in the service of opening up scientific knowledge, tools and data for reuse. We also promote the use of CC licensing in scientific publishing, on the belief that scientific papers need to be available to everyone in the world, not simply available to those with enough resources to afford subscription fees.
12. Is CC a left wing oriented movement?
I think that a lot of the ideas about sharing and Free Culture on more left than right, but I think that as CC becomes more ubiquitous, it is becoming more and more neutral. Again, I would suggest looking at the Internet. The open and free nature of the Internet resonates deeply with the people who are in the left wing, but is incredibly important and central for the military and the right wing.
There is definitely a left wing component of the CC movement, but to be successful, CC will need the buy-in and support of everyone.
13. How is CC different from Copyright?
CC builds upon copyright and doesn't replace it. CC licenses are licenses that use copyright law in various countries to describe how people want to share, very similar to how open source software licenses use copyright to make software shareable.
14. Tell us more about your work in Mozzila foundation?
The Mozilla Foundation is a non-profit organization that is working for the public benefit. There are no shareholders and the board is not paid.
One useful reference for this might be the Mozilla Foundation manifesto:
In it, we pledge:
The Mozilla Foundation pledges to support the Mozilla Manifesto in its activities. Specifically, we will:
* build and enable open-source technologies and communities that support the Manifesto's principles;
* build and deliver great consumer products that support the Manifesto's principles;
* use the Mozilla assets (intellectual property such as copyrights and trademarks, infrastructure, funds, and reputation) to keep the Internet an open platform;
* promote models for creating economic value for the public benefit; and
* promote the Mozilla Manifesto principles in public discourse and within the Internet industry.
Some Foundation activities–currently the creation, delivery and promotion of consumer products–are conducted primarily through the Mozilla Foundation's wholly owned subsidiary, the Mozilla Corporation.
15. In Macedonia the most famous Mozzila product is Firefox. Why is Firefox, and bunch of other products, free of charge for costumers?
Firefox is Open Source. Since Mozilla is a public benefit and we are trying to offer value for the public, we have decided that providing it for free helps the users and the Internet the most.
16. What is the future of Internet?
;-) Well hopefully Macedonia plays an important part of the future. The future is what we make it and we all need to work together to keep the Internet open and promote tools that provide voice to and empower the people.
During Larry's talk at the iCommons Summit he talked about shifting his focus from IP related stuff to fighting corruption. Some took that to mean that he would be abandoning the "movement" but Larry describes in a blog post that he's not leaving us, but rather shifting his focus. He will continue to work on Creative Commons, but his public and academic will shift. Please read his post for the nuance and the specifics.
I blogged a decision to become vegan on December 13, 2006 which is approximately six months ago. I'm happy to say that it was the right decision and that I've never been healthier or happier as long as I can remember and I intend to continue being a vegan.
Other than some allergies, I've gotten rid every one of half-a-dozen or so chronic conditions including obesity, fatty liver, high uric acid (gout), heartburn/ulcers/stomach acid, nervous tension, sleeping problems and rising cholesterol. I also have more energy than I've ever had.
I've lost approximately 18 kg (40 lb) or so and have been stable at this weight for about the last two months. Most of the weight fell off during the first few months and my weight loss has slowed to a basic equilibrium. Other than the slightly scrawny look I have now, I think most people think I look healthier.
The experience is not a scientific experiment. I started exercising almost every day, quit smoking and quit excessive drinking. Each of these things seems to help the other, but I don't think it's just the diet.
When I started this diet, I thought that it would be a sacrifice and that I would be trading good health for less fun. I am happy to say that I enjoy eating as much or more than when I was eating meats and fish. Since going vegan, I've really started getting into my garden and my composting. I spend hours and hours in the garden when I'm home. I dream about my garden and my compost and have really internalized the cycle of waste/compost/plants/food.
Now when I encounter a fresh tomato in a lonely airplane, I get a burst of joy as I imagine where this tomato has been, the soil that it came from and where the soil got the nutrients to allow the tomato to grow. When I eat local vegetables in my travels, I imagine what sort of local farms or hills the veggie came from and enjoy the image of the chain of events before I received it. In addition to the wonderful bursts of taste that I now appreciate much more, I also get the happy feeling of participating in this wonderful natural cycle. Mindfully eating a breakfast plate of grilled veggies and fresh fruits is really a joy.
Clearly, your milage may vary and I don't intend to proselytize or judgmental of those who aren't vegan. However, if you've thought about being a vegan for any reason, I suggest you try it. It isn't as hard as it sounds.
We're still working on getting more contributors for the Vegan Wikia if you're interested.
I'm reading The Art of Happiness by the Dalai Lama and Howard C. Cutler. In it, they suggest that we should focus on pursuing happiness as our goal in life and the we should be careful to make a distinction between happiness and pleasure. Doing crack, drinking alcohol and even enjoying nice weather are mostly pleasures and not real happiness.
One of the core elements of happiness, according to the Dalai Lama, is compassion. Cutler describes how many psychologists will argue that man is inherently greedy and that the first thing that babies try to do is look for a nipple to suck milk - an inherently greedy desire. However, Cutler argues that babies also have a basic instinct to connect with people and illicit a smile or compassion. Babies will stare at you and smile and this makes you feel good and care about the baby. This basic social behavior is an important instinct for babies in addition to the sucking for milk. The argument is that compassion is also a basic human behavior and not something that you have to learn after you are older.
The Dalai Lama describes ways of increasing compassion. One exercise he suggests is to meditate or think deeply about someone or something (like an animal) and think of that person or animal suffering. You could imagine a lamb in fear before it is about to be slaughtered or a friend in some deep pain. As you imagine this, a feeling of compassion emerges. The Dalai Lama explains that one should be able to feel compassionate towards everyone and everything.
In general, I'm a fairly compassionate person, but I do have people and things that annoy me. Recently I've started to practice meditating on those things that annoy me and building compassion and understanding. I still find it difficult at times, but as I do it more and more, I'm finding that I'm becoming happier and happier.
We then realize that we need to develop patience to build compassion. Our patience grows by being challenged by annoying or hurtful people and events. It is these people and events that ultimately are our teachers. We should learn to cherish and be thankful for these annoying things, because without them we would not grow and become even happier. (So thank you all of you annoying people! ha!)
Compassion vs greed is something that we've been talking a lot about in the context of amateur vs professional. I think that compassion and the happiness one gains from giving and sharing is one of the fundamental driving forces of the sharing economy just as greed and the "economic man" are fundamental elements of capitalism and neo-classical economics. I think that in order to really understand how the sharing economy works, we need to understand how happiness works and what makes people choose compassion over greed.
We often make decisions which involved trying to decide which decision will make us happier. We often mistake pleasure for happiness and make the choice that may be more pleasurable instead of the choice that would provide more long-term happiness. The Dalai Lama says that just framing questions to yourself in terms of what will give you more happiness and making a distinction between happiness and pleasure will help us make the right decisions.
It often takes self-control or will to choose happiness over pleasure. As I become more conscious of my happiness, I realize that awareness of this distinction and awareness of your happiness helps to reinforce and provide feedback for your decisions. This feedback makes it easier and easier to make the "right" choice.
Update: Added "patience" in paragraph about teachers.
Last month, I blogged about one of my new "missions" - to take photographs of people and post them under a CC-BY license so that Wikipedians and other people writing articles have access to photographs that they can use in articles. There is a problematic lack of usable photos of most people as any Google Image search will prove. I've been talking about this a bit more and Larry suggest we start a "freesouls" movement to encourage people to post take and post their photos under a free license.
I've started tagging any decent quality images of people on my Flickr stream tagged with their name and the tag "freesouls". If you're interested in joining, just start using the tag.
I did a workshop about photography at the iCommons Summit and discussed freesouls. One of the issues that came up about portraits was the issue of moral rights, model releases and privacy. We've decided to make the photography discussion at iCommons a permanent thing and will be setting up a "node" for this. If you're interested in discussing these issues, please join the node and the mailing list I'm setting up. For now, you can just sign up on my wiki or the Flickr group until we have a more permanent place for the node.
We'll mostly be discussing norms and legal issues around taking and sharing portraits as well techniques, tools, services and events. We'll also try to put together a tutorial online. We're planning to do the workshop again at iCommons Summit '08 in Sapporo.
Update: You can sign up for the Photo Commons mailing list here: http://labml.ito.com/mailman/listinfo/photo-commons_labml.ito.com
Martin blogs about Fiesta Fonera. Announcement includes new antenna for extra power, Fon WiFiAds with revenue share and roaming on other networks.
Disclosure: I'm a FON advisor and my company DG is an investor of FON.
Just when I thought I had come home, I'm off on a longish trip again.
I'll be going to Switzerland, Germany, Croatia, Macedonia, US and Puerto Rico. Haven't been to Europe in a few month so looking forward to it, but not looking forward to being away from home for so long again.
I just offset 300,000 miles of flying with 60 tons of wind energy carbon credits at NativeEnergy. Should last me for a bit.
See you on the other side.
Reflecting on All Things Digital, I got the feeling that I've missed thinking deeply about something that is probably obvious to a lot of people. Big media companies are leading the charge (fueling the bubble?) into Web 2.0 probably even more than VCs and startups. I definitely felt a kind of bubble-like feeling at the last O'Reilly Web 2.0 Expo, but after D I realized that it wasn't really a bubble so much as a charge after hearing the heads of companies like CBS, News Corp., Time, Viacom, etc. talk about how they were basically just getting started. It seemed like they all had almost weekly pipelines of multi-hundred-million-dollar acquisitions planned. They talked jealously about how after the $900M Google deal to buy the MySpace ads, it was clear that the $580M MySpace acquisition by News Corp. was a steal.
John Markoff also mentioned to me that if you had bought Apple stock at the Google IPO, you would have done better than if you had bought Google stock.
Watching and listening to these big companies talking about "the space" it felt like, in their eyes, and possibly in reality, these guys were "running the show". If nothing else, they were providing the exit scenarios for most of the investors in Silicon Valley now. Chatting to various friends at Google and Yahoo, it was clear that neither of the two would pay the kinds of valuations that the media companies were paying for their acquisitions.
I had mused about this and had even talked about this trend, but listening to MediaCo-to-MediaCo chatter, really made a deep impression on me and makes me feel that maybe this exuberance will continue longer than I had thought... at least unless there is some larger market catastrophe... Which is good I guess. ;-)
Saw Masaki and Takeshi from Sony yesterday. They are responsible for Eyevio, Sony's video sharing site. Eyevio uses CC licenses as a default allowing users to select their license when they upload. As Kirai reports, you can sync to the PSP and the Video Walkman. They also have it working with the Video iPod. They use H.264 with no DRM and only allow you to sync CC licensed content. My favorite part of the demo Takeshi did or me with his Video Walkman was when Eyevio popped up a dialog box when you were about to sync the videos that said, "Do you agree to abide by this CC license?" Awesome. Really.