Another one from BoingBoing
I truely love the OED and this new edition sounds cool. "bunny-hugger" in the OED is really something I must ponder tonight. I'm going to go to amazon now to buy this...
AskOxford.comThe essence of the Oxford English Dictionary2002 is indeed an auspicious year. It is the first year that can celebrate a World Cup, a Royal Jubilee, and a new edition of the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. In terms of frequency, a new Shorter comes between the other two events: it is almost ten years since the previous edition, and this is only the fifth edition of a book that was first published in 1933.
People often point out that 'Shorter' is a strange title for a two volume work. Of course it's only 'Short' when compared to the twenty volumes of the full Oxford English Dictionary. Although one tenth the size of the OED, it manages to include around one third of its content: it aims to include all words used in English since 1700, as well as everything in Shakespeare, the Authorized Version of the Bible, the poetry of Milton, and Spenser's Faerie Queene. As a historical dictionary, it includes obsolete words if they are used by major authors and earlier meanings where they explain the development of a word. More than ten centuries of English are covered here, from the Old English period to the 21st century.
Some 3,500 new entries have been added to the fifth edition. Asylum seeker, economic migrant, bed-blocking, and stakeholder pension reflect the serious side of life; bunny-hugger (a conservationist or animal lover), chick flick (a film appealing to women), gearhead (a car enthusiast), and Grinch (a spoilsport or killjoy) are entries in a more light-hearted vein. Several entries are testaments to the popularity of science fiction, among them Tardis from the TV series Doctor Who, Jedi from Star Wars, and Klingon from Star Trek.
This is nice to see - a shorter OED in book form, but I just can't imagine sticking this thing in my bag with my laptop. I want the OED online. I went to their web site and found it costs $550 a year for individual subscriptions. Humph! So I had a bit of a whiny playful exchange with them:
Obviously they've targeted their business at institutions and not individuals. Their site, pricing, and "email to subscribe" (not credit card or PayPal) is not terrifically net-wise. I hope they end up pricing their online services down some - it would be great to subscribe; I think my price-point would be no more than $200/year perhaps. But maybe if I got a trial subscription and I got used to it I would pay more. Or less!