I use MSN Instant Messenger, AIM, Yahoo, ICQ and Jabber and generally tried to keep groups of friends distributed across the different networks so that I wouldn't run into the buddy list limit. Today I hit my AIM buddy list limit. I think the limit is 150. For some reason, people aren't supposed to have more than 150 friends. Now, every time I want to add a friend on AIM, I have to delete someone else. I guess this might be good discipline, but I think this is a stupid feature/bug.
Too many buddies »
Joi
Aug 12, 2004 - 08:56 UTC »
Categories:
23 Comments
Leave a comment
1 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Too many buddies.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://joi.ito.com/mt/-touchme.cgi/2686
So, I was reading this post from Joi Ito, as well as all of the responses. I find the entire thing quite amusing. At first, I was thinking, "Sure, why bother with a limit at all. It's just a... Read More
Search
About this Archive
This page is an archive of recent entries in the Global Politics category.
Gender is the previous category.
Global Voices is the next category.
Find recent content on the main index.
Recent Posts
- Oliver Ding's Freesouls slide show
- KMD Digital Journalism Projects
- Board Report from June 2008 Creative Commons Board Meeting
- Climate Matters Video Contest
- FREESOULS: Captured and Released by Joi Ito
- Are my investments a conflict of interest as CEO of Creative Commons?
- Converting Technorati Japan to a Joint Venture
- New PGP Key
- Why you need a local partner in Japan
- Announcing the Open Web Foundation
Tag Cloud
Categories
- Activism (77)
- Advanced Science (9)
- Art (53)
- BitTorrent (1)
- Blogging about Blogging (501)
- Books (64)
- Business and the Economy (19)
- CPSR (4)
- Computer and Network Risks (26)
- Consumer Electronics (22)
- Cool Web Sites (81)
- Creative Commons (151)
- Dashboard (1)
- Eating and Cooking (40)
- Ecology (12)
- Economics (39)
- Email (18)
- Emergent Democracy (111)
- Energy (13)
- Flash (5)
- Gadgets (88)
- Games (35)
- Gender (10)
- Global Politics (113)
- Global Voices (39)
- Hardware (13)
- Health and Medicine (95)
- Heckling (46)
- Human Rights (19)
- Humor (164)
- ICANN (50)
- IM (2)
- IRC (47)
- Identity (15)
- Information and Media (60)
- Intellectual Property (124)
- Internet Policy (13)
- Introspective (79)
- Japanese Culture (123)
- Japanese National ID (29)
- Japanese Policy (97)
- Japanese Politics (50)
- Joi's Diary (656)
- Joicards (4)
- LOAF (15)
- Leadership and Entrepreneurship (21)
- Marketing (36)
- Media and Journalism (165)
- Moblogging (47)
- Movies (45)
- Mozilla (13)
- Music (103)
- Neoteny (20)
- Network Technology (51)
- Open Source Software (13)
- People (21)
- Photo (155)
- Podcasts (17)
- Privacy (104)
- Python Fun (18)
- Reforming Japanese Democracy (28)
- Religion (29)
- SARS (12)
- Salon (1)
- Search (51)
- Second Life (6)
- Sharing Economy (23)
- Six Apart (11)
- Social Software (116)
- Socialtext (5)
- Software (81)
- Technology Controversy (68)
- Technorati (26)
- US Policy and Politics (204)
- Venture Capital (17)
- Video (33)
- VoIP (12)
- Warblogging (101)
- Wiki (64)
- Wireless and Mobile (112)
- World of Warcraft (19)
Monthly Archives
- August 2008 (13)
- July 2008 (18)
- June 2008 (16)
- May 2008 (6)
- April 2008 (5)
- March 2008 (4)
- February 2008 (10)
- January 2008 (10)
- December 2007 (13)
- November 2007 (8)
- October 2007 (11)
- September 2007 (14)
- August 2007 (9)
- July 2007 (14)
- June 2007 (14)
- May 2007 (13)
- April 2007 (23)
- March 2007 (19)
- February 2007 (14)
- January 2007 (13)
- December 2006 (20)
- November 2006 (12)
- October 2006 (5)
- September 2006 (10)
- August 2006 (7)
- July 2006 (8)
- June 2006 (20)
- May 2006 (14)
- April 2006 (10)
- March 2006 (17)
- February 2006 (17)
- January 2006 (20)
- December 2005 (23)
- November 2005 (45)
- October 2005 (37)
- September 2005 (28)
- August 2005 (37)
- July 2005 (37)
- June 2005 (29)
- May 2005 (48)
- April 2005 (55)
- March 2005 (44)
- February 2005 (37)
- January 2005 (43)
- December 2004 (57)
- November 2004 (79)
- October 2004 (85)
- September 2004 (62)
- August 2004 (78)
- July 2004 (77)
- June 2004 (61)
- May 2004 (72)
- April 2004 (56)
- March 2004 (76)
- February 2004 (74)
- January 2004 (94)
- December 2003 (71)
- November 2003 (69)
- October 2003 (72)
- September 2003 (71)
- August 2003 (59)
- July 2003 (65)
- June 2003 (60)
- May 2003 (53)
- April 2003 (79)
- March 2003 (106)
- February 2003 (71)
- January 2003 (68)
- December 2002 (56)
- November 2002 (54)
- October 2002 (73)
- September 2002 (50)
- August 2002 (61)
- July 2002 (32)
- June 2002 (12)
- May 2002 (1)
- April 2002 (2)
- December 2001 (1)
- October 2001 (1)
- July 2001 (1)
- February 2001 (1)
- January 2001 (1)
- December 2000 (1)
- November 2000 (1)
- October 2000 (1)
- September 2000 (1)
- August 2000 (1)
- July 2000 (1)
- June 2000 (1)
- May 2000 (1)
- April 2000 (2)
- March 2000 (1)
- February 2000 (1)
- January 2000 (1)
- December 1999 (1)
- November 1999 (1)
- October 1999 (1)
- September 1999 (3)
- April 1999 (1)
- February 1999 (5)
- January 1999 (2)
- December 1998 (2)
- October 1998 (1)
- August 1998 (7)
- November 1997 (1)
- October 1997 (1)
- June 1997 (1)
- April 1997 (1)
- October 1996 (1)
- October 1995 (1)
- June 1995 (1)
- May 1995 (1)
- March 1995 (2)
- November 1994 (1)
- July 1993 (2)
![Joi Ito [logo]](/_site/img/joi-ito-logo-92x.png)



So stupid! My gosh - I hit the limit myself. Why would you ever want to have a limit? Is it technology, I wonder, or social engineering - maybe they're gearing up for a premium service?
I suspect it's probably an issue with the amount of traffic the AIM network can handle. Maybe it's time to move to another network! Or use something besides iChat. Hurm.
(I submitted a complaint to AOL customer service about this two weeks ago).
Perhaps the 150 friends limit is to prevent mass broadcasts of spam. If that is the case, it's merely a speed bump because spammers could always establish multiple fake accounts.
I keep bumping up against the limit and having to delete people I don't talk to as much. On trillian, the limit is somewhere around 250 or something, and even that's a limit.
The biggest scaling issue w/ IMs is presence. There's more traffic on the network telling people this and that guy went on and offline, then actually conversations. Thus, you should now understand why the limit and that 150 is a lot. And by the way, MSN's limit is 150 also.
150, as in the number Dunbar says works for a tribe? You just need to tell AOL that your neocortex is substantially larger than average, and you can handle a bigger tribe.
Maybe the developers don't have a lot of friends.
Maybe the definition of "friend" needs an overhaul.
Can you not open more than one AIM/ICQ account and use them simultaneously? If you're using something like Proteus (which you should be!) then I think the experience of using several accounts together will be seemless.
danah boyd's been grumbling about this for months (as have plenty of others, but danah's comments tend to be about the best). Have a look here , and at other comments on the topic every few weeks. As for the number 150, she says
"Next, take the number 150. I've heard over and over again how the average person only knows 150 people. This is referring to research done by Dunbar. He was interested in understanding how many people humans could "groom." In other words, how many people did a human keep in their social network at any one point in time. Dunbar was interested in how monkeys groomed each other to keep up their social network. What he found was that there was a similarity between monkey grooming and human gossip. Just as monkeys groomed to maintain their networks, humans gossiped to maintain theirs! He found that the MAXIMUM number of people that a person could keep up with socially at any given time, gossip maintenance, was 150. This doesn't mean that people don't have 150 people in their social network, but that they only keep tabs on 150 people max at any given point."
The maximum number of AOL Instant Messenger buddies is 200.
I'm pretty sure that the next Buddy List is going to be the next mobile telephone operating system.
With Trillian, and Gaim, and a few other clients, you can aggregate any number of AIM, Yahoo, MSN, IRC, Sametime, ICQ, etc. screennames simultaneously, and have them all in a single buddy list. Just grab a 2nd screenname and set them both up in the client.
150 buddies? Never alone behind your computer. I can understand why you need a retreat.
I use Fire... It's OpenSource, but for Mac OSX only... Unlimited buddies and every major IM service at once!
150? 200 sounds more like it. All I know is that I have 176 right now in AIM...
I have complained about buddy limits in different clients for years. It's so pointless. I wish AIM/MSN teams would listen to the users who make the software possible.
I've experienced a 200-name limit in AIM. In the latest versions of AOL's AIM client you can create additional accounts and then link them so they sign on and off together. But that doesn't quite work right because it doesn't merge the buddy lists. The client doesn't show them all at once.
I agree, especially considering that the limits are usually relatively low (such as 150 or 200). If you're gonna set a limit, at least make it logical, such as 1000 or something.
i have the same problem. one of my friends said you can use some other program, and have 2 buddy lists for one screenname, so the limit would be 400. i was wondering if anyone can give me instructions on how to do this.
Update- Today an AOL developer announced that AIM BuddyLists have been upgraded to allow 250 total buddies. Details at
http://journals.aol.com/juberti/runningman/entries/136
Great news! Thanks Nick. But 250 is still not enough. ;-)
no thats not the limit i have 478 buddies on my buddy list...
i think i also saw something that said [over] 500 buddies
but im not sure cuz i wasnt really paying attention to that..
yeah for some reason i have maxed at 407, what an odd #, aim can blow me
I have 222 friends and im scared..