They just announced that the conference is on the record (yay!) but there are no photos allowed (boo!). They cited security reasons. I have a feeling maybe this had something to do with it. (disclaimer: I had nothing to do with the "derivative work")
Cite
✖
Cite
-
APAIto, J. (2006, June 29). No Photos from Fortune Brainstorm 2006. Joi Ito's Web [Blog post]. https://joi.ito.com/weblog/2006/06/29/no-photos-from.html
-
MLAIto, Joichi. “No Photos from Fortune Brainstorm 2006.” Joi Ito's Web, 29 June 2006 https://joi.ito.com/weblog/2006/06/29/no-photos-from.html. Accessed 5 Sep 2025
-
Chicago (CMS)Ito, Joichi. “No Photos from Fortune Brainstorm 2006.” Joi Ito's Web (Blog), June 29, 2006, https://joi.ito.com/weblog/2006/06/29/no-photos-from.html
-
HarvardIto, J. (2006). No Photos from Fortune Brainstorm 2006. Joi Ito's Web. https://joi.ito.com/weblog/2006/06/29/no-photos-from.html
-
VancouverIto J. No Photos from Fortune Brainstorm 2006. Joi Ito's Web [Internet]. 2006 Jun 29; Available from: https://joi.ito.com/weblog/2006/06/29/no-photos-from.html
-
Bibtex
@online{Ito2006NoPhotosfr, author = {Ito, Joichi}, title = {{No Photos from Fortune Brainstorm 2006}}, journal = {Joi Ito's Web}, type = {Blog}, url = {https://joi.ito.com/weblog/2006/06/29/no-photos-from.html}, urldate = {2025-09-05}, date = {2006-06-29}, year = {2006}, month = {Jun}, day = {29} }
2 Comments
Recent Posts
- True North Between the Dragons
- No mud, no lotus
- Using High Dynamic Range (HDR) iPhone Footage in Premiere Pro 2.3.2
- web3 in Japan
- The World Is Complex. Measuring Charity Has to Be Too
- Is philanthropy a bad excuse for limiting strong government?
- Impact Investment Metrics and Their Limitations
- Space Exploration and the Age of the Anthropocosmos
- It's OK That Amazon Will (Likely) Get the .amazon Domain
- Optimize Algorithms to Support Kids Online, Not Exploit Them
Is it just me or are "security reasons" a realy convenient excuse to stop pretty much anything you do not like? I'm pretty fed up of this fad.
If they're going to put a stop to sousveillance "for security reasons" they should also put a stop to surveillance as well.
If these people are so important that they can't be 'glogged, then they should also be suspicious of the cameras installed in the building.
If you're going to have security, why lock one door and leave the other one unlocked?
If you're going to lock the basement door, you should lock the upstairs door as well.
Otherwise, the one-sided approach to security creates an imbalance that's ripe for abuse.